Case 2402379/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Thompson v Rochdale Boroughwide Housing Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2402379/2021
- Decision date
- 27 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Thompson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 10 December 2021, the Tribunal gave Mr J Thompson an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated reasons were that he had failed to comply with case management orders dated 16 July 2021, had failed to reply to the Tribunal's letter of 24 November 2021 seeking an explanation for non-compliance, and that it appeared the claim was not being actively pursued.
Mr Thompson did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The judgment records no substantive determination of the underlying merits and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The reasons refer only to 'the claim'. The case was listed by GOV.UK as Unfair Dismissal, which is the basis used here for classification. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.