Case 2402383/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Styles & Wood Ltd (In Administration) — 2021
- Case reference
- 2402383/2020
- Decision date
- 19 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimants sought protective awards for breach of the collective consultation requirements. The respondent stated that the claims were not contested, and Employment Judge Phil Allen, sitting alone, determined the matter under Rule 21. The judgment applies to the protective award claims only; any other claims brought by any claimant remained stayed and were not determined.
The tribunal found that the respondent had no recognised trade union for collective bargaining, consultation or negotiation and no elected representatives. The claimants were told that the respondent was to be, or had been, placed into administration on 26, 27 or 28 February 2020, and the first redundancies took effect on 28 February 2020. There was no consultation with the claimants, no proper warning or notice, and no written information was provided in advance. The respondent employed over 200 employees at the establishment, all of whom were dismissed on or around the same date.
On those facts the tribunal found a breach of section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 and made a protective award under section 189 in favour of each claimant for the maximum protected period of 90 days beginning on 28 February 2020. The reasons note that a protective award is a two-stage process and that no financial award is made at this stage; individual payment or quantification would arise separately if needed. The tribunal also recorded that the Employment Protection (Recoupment of Jobseeker's Allowance and Income Support) Regulations 1996 applied and required the respondent to supply prescribed information to the Secretary of State.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award under sections 188 and 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 for failure to consult. The judgment states that it applies to protective award claims only; any other claims remained stayed and were not determined. No monetary sum was quantified at this stage. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- section 188 TULRCA 1992
- section 189 TULRCA 1992
- section 188A TULRCA 1992
- Employment Protection (Recoupment of Jobseeker's Allowance and Income Support) Regulations 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.