Case 2402391/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Dr G T Parker v Liverpool John Moores University — 2025
- Case reference
- 2402391/2024
- Decision date
- 27 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dunlop
- Venue
- Liverpool
- Panel members
- Mr R Alldritt, Mrs M Plimley
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Dr G T Parker
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the claim at Liverpool Employment Tribunal by CVP on 21-22 May 2025 before Employment Judge Dunlop, with Mr R Alldritt and Mrs M Plimley sitting as lay members. The claimant, Dr G T Parker, appeared in person and the respondent, Liverpool John Moores University, was represented by counsel.
The judgment records a single substantive outcome: the claimant's complaint of victimisation was found not well-founded. On that basis, the claim was dismissed.
The extracted text does not include the tribunal's oral reasons, but it notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would be provided in due course. No monetary remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victimisation | The judgment states that the claimant's complaint of victimisation was not well-founded. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and written reasons were to be provided in due course. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.