Case 2402519/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Ellis v St Helens and Knowsley Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust and 1 other — 2019
- Case reference
- 2402519/2019
- Decision date
- 1 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Buzzard REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Miss E Ellis
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal refused the first respondent's application to stay the claimant's claim until the conclusion of an internal grievance. The claimant produced a signed witness statement confirming that her employment with the first respondent had ceased and that she did not wish to pursue any internal grievance further, so the Tribunal found there was no basis for a stay.
The Tribunal granted the claimant's application to amend her ET1 on the terms set out in her email of 25 June 2019. The ET1 presented on 25 June 2019 was to stand as the claimant's claim form in substitution for any earlier claim form in these proceedings.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment is a preliminary hearing decision on a stay application and an amendment application. It does not adjudicate the substantive claims or identify their pleaded legal basis in the extracted text. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.