Case 2402553/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss N Helme Steff v University Hospitals Of Morecambe Bay NHS Foundation Trust — 2025
- Case reference
- 2402553/2024
- Decision date
- 30 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss N Helme Steff
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim. It recorded that by letter dated 23 December 2024 the claimant was given an opportunity to make written representations, or to request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out because she had not responded to the Tribunal's letter dated 8 November 2024.
The Tribunal found that the claim had not been actively pursued. It further found that the claimant had failed to make representations in writing, or had failed to make any sufficient representations, explaining why strike-out should not follow, and had not requested a hearing. On that basis, the claim was struck out.
The judgment was approved by Employment Judge Phil Allen on 22 January 2025 and sent to the parties on 30 January 2025.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying pleaded causes of action. The claim was struck out because the claimant had not responded to the Tribunal's letter dated 8 November 2024, was given an opportunity by letter dated 23 December 2024 to make representations or request a hearing, and did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.