Case 2402671/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms G Howson v Restore (Cumbria) — 2023
- Case reference
- 2402671/2022
- Decision date
- 6 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rhodes Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms G Howson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal first held that it was not reasonably practicable for Ms G Howson to present her complaints within the primary time limits, and that she presented them within a reasonable further period. The Tribunal therefore accepted jurisdiction to hear the case.
On the merits, the complaint of automatic unfair dismissal contrary to section 104(1)(b) Employment Rights Act 1996 succeeded. The complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages under section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996 also succeeded, and the respondent was ordered to pay £1,113.76 gross.
The Tribunal further upheld the complaint that there had been an infringement of the right to be accompanied at a disciplinary hearing under section 10 Employment Relations Act 1999, and the complaint that the respondent failed to provide a written statement of employment particulars contrary to section 1 Employment Rights Act 1996.
Two other automatic unfair dismissal complaints were dismissed: the complaint under section 100(1)(e) Employment Rights Act 1996 and the complaint under section 103A Employment Rights Act 1996. The written record also includes a notice under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 stating that the relevant decision day was 6 March 2023, the calculation day was 7 March 2023, and the stipulated rate of interest was 8% per annum, but no separate interest sum was set out in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Automatic unfair dismissal contrary to section 104(1)(b) Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent was ordered to pay £1,113.76 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,114 |
| Other | Infringement of the right to be accompanied at a disciplinary hearing under section 10 Employment Relations Act 1999. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | Failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars under section 1 Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Automatic unfair dismissal contrary to section 100(1)(e) Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | Automatic unfair dismissal contrary to section 103A Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,114
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
7 references- not reasonably practicable / reasonable further period
- s.104(1)(b) ERA 1996
- s.13 ERA 1996
- s.10 Employment Relations Act 1999
- s.1 ERA 1996
- s.100(1)(e) ERA 1996
- s.103A ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.