Case 2402715/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Gina Queen v Hopwood Hall College — 2026
- Case reference
- 2402715/2024
- Decision date
- 7 January 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge G Tobin Appearances
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Gina Queen
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the claimant was disabled under s6 and Schedule 1 of the Equality Act 2010 at the material time from September 2023 to January 2024.
The tribunal found that the respondent did not fail in its duty to make reasonable adjustments under ss20 and 21 of the Equality Act 2010, and that the claimant was not harassed by the respondent in breach of s26 of the Equality Act 2010. Consequently, the claimant's disability discrimination claims were dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states the claimant was disabled under s6 and Schedule 1 Equality Act 2010 at the material time, but that the respondent did not fail in its duty to make reasonable adjustments under ss20 and 21 Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | The judgment states the claimant was not harassed by the respondent in breach of s26 Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- s6 Equality Act 2010
- Schedule 1 Equality Act 2010
- ss20 and 21 Equality Act 2010
- s26 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.