Case 2402796/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms K Glover & others (see attached schedule) v Halton Borough Council & others (see attached schedule) — 2026
- Case reference
- 2402796/2020
- Decision date
- 10 February 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Butler
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms K Glover & others (see attached schedule)
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal wrote to the claimants on 10 February 2026 warning that it was considering striking out the claims because they appeared not to have been actively pursued. The letter gave the claimants an opportunity to explain why the claims should not be struck out or to request a hearing, and the claimants did not reply.
Employment Judge M Butler was satisfied that the grounds for striking out the claims under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 applied, and that strike-out would accord with the overriding objective in Rule 3. The claims were therefore struck out.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part-time worker regulations | The gov.uk listing identifies Part Time Workers; the judgment states that the claims are struck out because they have not been actively pursued, but does not provide further particulars of the claims. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The gov.uk listing identifies Working Time Regulations; the judgment states that the claims are struck out because they have not been actively pursued, but does not provide further particulars of the claims. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- overriding objective in Rule 3
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.