Case 2402985/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Bielskiene v KSA Management Services Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2402985/2020
- Decision date
- 26 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Holbrook REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Bielskiene
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing in Manchester by CVP on 23 February 2021 before Employment Judge Holbrook, the claimant, who appeared in person, applied to amend her ET1 to introduce claims for harassment on the grounds of sex and unpaid wages. The tribunal refused that application.
The written record also states that, for the avoidance of doubt, any other claims for unlawful discrimination are dismissed. The decision was sent to the parties on 26 February 2021, and the record notes that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the tribunal's note on reasons.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | The claimant sought to add this claim by amendment; the amendment was refused at the preliminary hearing. | Other | Sex | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claimant sought to add an unpaid wages claim by amendment; the amendment was refused at the preliminary hearing. | Other | — | — |
| Other | The judgment states that, for the avoidance of doubt, any other claims for unlawful discrimination are dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.