Case 2403065/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr H Melmoth v Alternative Futures Group Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 2403065/2023
- Decision date
- 21 January 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ross
- Venue
- Manchester
- Panel members
- Mrs A Eyre, Mrs H Sheard
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr H Melmoth
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal dismissed the claimant's claim that he suffered six detriments for making two protected disclosures pursuant to sections 47B and 43B of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The judgment states that this claim was not well founded and failed.
The Tribunal also dismissed the claimant's claim for failure to make reasonable adjustments pursuant to sections 20 to 21 of the Equality Act 2010. The judgment gives no remedy award and contains no further reasons beyond the stated outcomes.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The judgment states that the claim alleging six detriments for making two protected disclosures under sections 47B and 43B Employment Rights Act 1996 was not well founded and failed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the claim for failure to make reasonable adjustments under sections 20 to 21 Equality Act 2010 was not well founded and failed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.