Case 2403197/2024 · Employment Tribunal
S Carrington v Arriva Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2403197/2024
- Decision date
- 23 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Buzzard REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
S Carrington
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Buzzard heard the case at Liverpool by video on 17 October 2024 and gave the judgment orally. The written record states that the claims were not presented within the applicable time limit, and that it was reasonably practicable to do so. On that basis, the claimant's claims were dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written judgment does not separate the claims individually; it states that the claims were not presented within the applicable time limit and that it was reasonably practicable to do so, so the claimant's claims were dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The written judgment does not separate the claims individually; it states that the claims were not presented within the applicable time limit and that it was reasonably practicable to do so, so the claimant's claims were dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The written judgment does not separate the claims individually; it states that the claims were not presented within the applicable time limit and that it was reasonably practicable to do so, so the claimant's claims were dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- reasonably practicable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.