Case 2403387/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Z Manjra v DWP HELD AT: Liverpool — 2025
- Case reference
- 2403387/2024
- Decision date
- 11 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Z Manjra
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing in a disability discrimination claim. The claimant alleged discrimination arising from disability, failure to make reasonable adjustments, indirect discrimination, harassment and victimisation. The respondent accepted fibromyalgia, PTSD, anxiety and stress as disabilities, but did not accept autism, carpal tunnel syndrome, asthma or Long Covid.
At the hearing the claimant no longer relied on asthma, carpal tunnel syndrome or Long Covid as disabilities, and those asserted disabilities were dismissed upon withdrawal. The Tribunal considered whether autism was a disability for the purposes of section 6 Equality Act 2010 and found that, although the claimant had substantial and long-term impairments affecting day-to-day activities, the evidence did not establish that those impairments arose from autism rather than from accepted conditions including fibromyalgia, PTSD, stress and anxiety.
The Tribunal held that the claimant was not disabled by reason of autism at the relevant times. The disability discrimination claim was not finally determined and will proceed in relation to the accepted disabilities.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary issue only: the Tribunal found the claimant was not disabled by reason of autism at the relevant times. The asserted disabilities of carpal tunnel syndrome, Long Covid syndrome and asthma were no longer relied upon and were dismissed upon withdrawal. The wider disability discrimination claim proceeds in relation to fibromyalgia, PTSD, anxiety and stress, which the respondent accepted were disabilities. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | The claimant brought a harassment complaint under section 26 Equality Act 2010. This judgment did not determine the merits of that complaint; it decided only the preliminary disability-status issue for autism and recorded withdrawal of asthma, carpal tunnel syndrome and Long Covid as asserted disabilities. | Other | Disability | — |
| Victimisation | The claimant brought a victimisation complaint under section 27 Equality Act 2010. This judgment did not determine the merits of that complaint; it decided only the preliminary disability-status issue for autism and recorded withdrawal of asthma, carpal tunnel syndrome and Long Covid as asserted disabilities. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
7 references- section 6 Equality Act 2010
- section 15 Equality Act 2010
- sections 20 and 21 Equality Act 2010
- section 19 Equality Act 2010
- section 26 Equality Act 2010
- section 27 Equality Act 2010
- Equal Treatment Bench Book
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.