Case 2403513/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Dodd v The Hut Group — 2020
- Case reference
- 2403513/2020
- Decision date
- 29 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Dodd
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment is a short Rule 52 withdrawal judgment. It records that the proceedings in Mr S Dodd v The Hut Group Limited were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. No findings on the merits of the underlying complaint are set out in the text provided.
No remedy, liability finding, or compensatory award is recorded. The only substantive procedural outcome is that the claim was withdrawn and the proceedings were dismissed on that basis.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. No merits determination or remedy is recorded. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.