Case 2403595/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms F. Asghar v Peninsula Business Services Ltd Richard Prior Michelle Jackson — 2025
- Case reference
- 2403595/2024
- Decision date
- 15 December 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leach
- Venue
- Manchester
- Panel members
- Mr B. McCaughey, Mr B Rowen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms F. Asghar
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found for Ms F. Asghar on unfair dismissal. It also upheld her section 18 Equality Act 2010 pregnancy and maternity discrimination complaints against the first and third respondent in relation to failing to carry out a pregnancy risk assessment, cancelling an intended occupational health appointment, and dismissing the claimant. In addition, it upheld her section 47(C) Employment Rights Act 1996 pregnancy-related detriment complaints against the first respondent concerning the risk assessment and occupational health appointment, and her section 27 Equality Act 2010 victimisation complaint against the first and second respondents concerning refusal of annual leave on 30 December 2024.
The tribunal dismissed all race direct discrimination complaints, all religion direct discrimination complaints, all race harassment complaints, all religion harassment complaints, all other victimisation complaints, and the automatic unfair dismissal complaint under section 99(3)(a) Employment Rights Act 1996 and Regulation 20(1) of the Maternity and Parental Leave etc Regulations 1999. This was a liability judgment only: remedy was not determined and was listed for a further hearing on 16 and 17 July 2026.
Claims and outcomes
13 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | General unfair dismissal complaint. | Upheld | — | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | Section 18 Equality Act 2010 claim about failing to carry out a pregnancy risk assessment, against the first and third respondent. | Upheld | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | Section 18 Equality Act 2010 claim about cancelling an intended occupational health appointment, against the first and third respondent. | Upheld | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | Section 18 Equality Act 2010 claim about dismissing the claimant, against the first and third respondent. | Upheld | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Other | Section 47(C) Employment Rights Act 1996 detriment due to pregnancy claim about failing to carry out a pregnancy risk assessment, against the first respondent. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | Section 47(C) Employment Rights Act 1996 detriment due to pregnancy claim about cancelling an intended occupational health appointment, against the first respondent. |
Legal tests applied
5 references- section 18 Equality Act 2010
- section 47(C) Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 27 Equality Act 2010
- section 99(3)(a) Employment Rights Act 1996
- Regulation 20(1) Maternity and Parental Leave etc Regulations 1999
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.