Case 2403717/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Blair v National Crime Agency — 2018
- Case reference
- 2403717/2017
- Decision date
- 10 July 2018
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Barker REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Blair
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing concerning limitation and clarification of the claimant's pleaded claims. The Tribunal found that the ET1 included complaints of failure to make reasonable adjustments and harassment on grounds of disability. It found that the claim did not include a complaint of direct discrimination, and no application to amend to add such a complaint had been made.
The Tribunal held that the reasonable adjustments complaints related to events during Adam Ainsworth's period as line manager, ending in November 2015, including alleged issues with software, equipment, targets and a performance improvement plan. Applying the Morgan authority, it found those complaints were out of time. It also found that the harassment allegations, concerning alleged incidents in September and October 2014, were discrete complaints and were out of time when the ET1 was presented on 2 August 2017.
The Tribunal nevertheless held that it was just and equitable to extend time for the disability-related claims pleaded in the ET1. It accepted that the claimant had reasonably relied on inaccurate advice from her union representative to wait until internal grievance processes had concluded, and also took account of periods of illness related to disability and maternity leave. It found that a fair hearing remained possible, noting the existence of contemporaneous documentation and the claimant's recall of many events.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The pleaded failure to make reasonable adjustments complaint under section 21 Equality Act 2010 was found to be out of time, but the Tribunal held it was just and equitable to extend time. The merits were not determined in this judgment. | Other | Disability | — |
| Harassment | The pleaded harassment complaint under section 26 Equality Act 2010 was found to be out of time, but the Tribunal held it was just and equitable to extend time. The merits were not determined in this judgment. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- section 123 Equality Act 2010
- section 123(1)(b) Equality Act 2010
- Abertawe Bro Morgannwg University Local Health Board v Morgan [2018] EWCA Civ 640
- section 21 Equality Act 2010
- section 26 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.