Case 2404170/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Kauser v Inaaya Solicitors Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2404170/2023
- Decision date
- 14 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ficklin
- Panel members
- Ms E Cadbury, Mr D Wilson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Kauser
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Manchester Employment Tribunal, heard on 28, 29, 30, 31 May and 3 June 2024 before Employment Judge Ficklin with Ms E Cadbury and Mr D Wilson, the tribunal found that Ms S Kauser’s claims of unfair dismissal under s.98 Employment Rights Act 1996 and detriment as a part-time worker under the Part-Time Workers (Protection from Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2000 were well-founded and succeeded. The tribunal also upheld her claims of discrimination arising from disability under s.15 Equality Act 2010, indirect disability discrimination under s.19, and failure to make reasonable adjustments under ss.20-21.
Claims and outcomes
7 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | Claim under s.18 Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Sex discrimination | Indirect sex discrimination claim under s.19 Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Claim under s.98 Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | — |
| Part-time worker regulations | Claim for detriment as a part-time worker under the Part-Time Workers (Protection from Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2000. | Upheld | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Claim under s.15 Equality Act 2010, described in the judgment as discrimination for having a disability. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Indirect disability discrimination claim under s.19 Equality Act 2010. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Failure to make reasonable adjustments claim under ss.20-21 Equality Act 2010. | Upheld |
Legal tests applied
6 references- s.98 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Part-Time Workers (Protection from Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2000
- s.15 Equality Act 2010
- s.19 Equality Act 2010
- ss.20-21 Equality Act 2010
- s.18 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.