Case 2404193/2017 · Employment Tribunal
in person For the v Mr Clarke (litigation Consultant) — 2019
- Case reference
- 2404193/2017
- Decision date
- 22 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gray Date
- Panel members
- Ms A Sinclair, Mr N A Knight
Parties
2 namedClaimant
in person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Southampton on 1 to 2 October 2019, before Employment Judge Gray with members Ms A Sinclair and Mr N A Knight, the claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Mr Clarke (Consultant). The tribunal recorded that the complaints of unfair dismissal and outstanding wages were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant.
The tribunal also dismissed the direct discrimination claim on the grounds of race. It further dismissed the claim for accrued but untaken holiday pay and the claim for breach of contract in respect of notice pay, described in the judgment as wrongful dismissal.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Described as a complaint for outstanding wages; dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Race discrimination | Direct discrimination on the grounds of race. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Holiday pay | Claim for accrued but untaken holiday pay. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Claim for notice pay, described in the judgment as wrongful dismissal. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.