Case 2404606/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs C Smith v G4S Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2404606/2019
- Decision date
- 21 June 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs C Smith
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge T V Ryan recorded that the claimant’s claims succeeded. The judgment states that Mrs C Smith was unfairly, constructively, dismissed by G4S PLC Limited, and that the respondent discriminated against her in relation to disability.
The disability claim is set out in the judgment by particulars: direct discrimination, discrimination arising from disability, failure to make reasonable adjustments, and harassment. The judgment does not give reasons on liability, but it records each of those heads as successful.
Remedy was not determined in this judgment. The tribunal directed that remedy would be considered at a hearing on 22 July 2019 at 2.15pm, described as a preliminary hearing converted to a remedy hearing, at the Liverpool Employment Tribunal.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment records that the claimant was unfairly, constructively, dismissed by the respondent. | Upheld | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records that the respondent discriminated against the claimant in relation to disability by direct discrimination, discrimination arising from disability, a failure to make reasonable adjustments, and harassment. | Upheld | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.