Case 2404720/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Brown v Interstate Hotels UK Ltd and 4 others — 2024
- Case reference
- 2404720/2022
- Decision date
- 13 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Butler
- Venue
- Manchester
- Panel members
- Mrs J Pennie, Ms V Worthington
Parties
6 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat in Manchester on 29 and 30 April and 1, 2, 3 and 7 May 2024 before Employment Judge M Butler, with lay members Mrs J Pennie and Ms V Worthington. Mr S Brown appeared for himself and the respondents were represented by counsel. The written judgment records complaints of harassment related to disability, direct disability discrimination, discrimination arising from disability, indirect disability discrimination, failure to make reasonable adjustments, victimisation, and unfair dismissal.
Each complaint was dismissed. The tribunal stated that the harassment related to disability complaint failed in its entirety, as did the direct disability discrimination, discrimination arising from disability, indirect disability discrimination, reasonable adjustments, and victimisation complaints. It also found that Mr Brown had not been unfairly dismissed. The judgment further states that all claims brought in the proceedings were dismissed.
The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested, so no further substantive reasoning or remedy award is set out in the document.
Claims and outcomes
7 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | Harassment related to disability. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Direct disability discrimination. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Discrimination arising from disability. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Indirect disability discrimination. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Failure to make reasonable adjustments. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Victimisation | Victimisation complaint. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant had not been unfairly dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.