Case 2404780/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss N K Dar v JD Sports Fashion plc — 2023
- Case reference
- 2404780/2022
- Decision date
- 15 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Housego
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss N K Dar
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal had written to the claimant on 23 August 2023 giving her an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing about why the claim should not be struck out. The stated reasons included failure to comply with case management orders made by Employment Judge Housego on 4 February 2023, failure to respond to Tribunal correspondence, failure to provide disability-related material and further information by the required deadline, and the appearance that the claim was not being actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations against strike out, and did not request a hearing. The claim was therefore struck out, and the hearing listed for 2-6 October 2023 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claim is struck out; the PDF text does not separately address the pleaded unfair dismissal claim. | Struck out | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claim is struck out; the PDF text does not separately address the pleaded breach of contract claim. | Struck out | — | — |
| Age discrimination | The judgment states that the claim is struck out; the PDF text does not separately address the age discrimination claim. | Struck out | Age | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the claim is struck out and refers to non-provision of a disability impact statement, medical records and further information. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that the claim is struck out; the PDF text does not separately address the race discrimination claim. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | The judgment states that the claim is struck out; the PDF text does not separately address the religion or belief discrimination claim. | Struck out | Religion or belief | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.