Case 2404863/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs H Valley v Outcomes First Group — 2022
- Case reference
- 2404863/2022
- Decision date
- 8 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs H Valley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary judgment on the respondent's application to strike out the claimant's case. Judge Cowx, sitting alone in Manchester by CVP on 18 November 2022, recorded that the claimant's claim was potentially one of a continuing act.
The tribunal decided that whether the claim was time barred under section 123 of the Equality Act 2010 would be determined at the final hearing rather than on the strike out application. On that basis, the application to strike out the claim was dismissed.
No substantive findings on liability, remedy, or any final outcome for the underlying claims were made in this judgment. The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that no separate written reasons would be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | This was the respondent's application to strike out the claim. The tribunal held the claimant's case was potentially a continuing act and said the section 123 Equality Act 2010 time-bar issue would be determined at the final hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 123 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.