Case 2404994/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Jenkins v Prime Care (UK) Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2404994/2019
- Decision date
- 29 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Buzzard REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L Jenkins
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Liverpool on 6 August 2019, Employment Judge Buzzard heard the case of Miss L Jenkins against Prime Care (UK) Limited. The judgment records that the claimant withdrew her sex discrimination claim, and that claim was dismissed on withdrawal.
The judgment also records that the claimant withdrew her claim for unlawful deduction from wages, which was based on an allegation that the respondent had failed to pay her full pay prior to termination of employment. That claim was likewise dismissed on withdrawal. The judgment contains no findings on the merits of either claim and records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | The judgment states that the sex discrimination claim was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claim for unlawful deduction from wages, said to arise from failure to pay full pay prior to termination, was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.