Case 2405085/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Smith v Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust — 2024
- Case reference
- 2405085/2022
- Decision date
- 7 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leach
- Panel members
- Mrs A Eyres, Mr D Lancaster
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Smith
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Manchester by CVP on 19-23 February 2024 before Employment Judge Leach, Mrs A Eyres and Mr D Lancaster, heard Mr S Smith's Equality Act 2010 complaints against Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust. The judgment records claims of harassment, direct race discrimination and victimisation.
The tribunal dismissed all of those complaints. The written record states that the complaints of harassment and direct discrimination, with race as the protected characteristic, did not succeed, and that the victimisation complaint also did not succeed.
The judgment does not record any monetary award, any liability split between the claims, or any separate remedy findings. It also notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the tribunal's note.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Race discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Victimisation | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.