Case 2405339/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss T McLoughin v Sue Ryder — 2022
- Case reference
- 2405339/2020
- Decision date
- 11 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sharkett
- Panel members
- Ms C Clover, Ms F Crane
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss T McLoughin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal at Manchester, sitting via CVP on 25-27 August 2021 and 4-7 January 2022, held that Miss T McLoughin’s unfair dismissal claim was well founded and succeeded. It recorded that a Polkey deduction of 100% applied and that the claimant had contributed to her own dismissal to the extent of 100%, but the judgment did not finally determine remedy at that stage.
The tribunal also held that the claimant’s claim of direct discrimination on the basis of disability was well founded in respect of Allegation one and succeeded. A remedy hearing was listed for 1 April 2022, and no monetary award is set out in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the unfair dismissal claim well founded and recorded a 100% Polkey deduction and 100% contributory fault; remedy was adjourned to a later hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal found direct discrimination on the basis of disability well founded in respect of Allegation one. | Upheld | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Polkey deduction
- contributory fault
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.