Case 2405355/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms D Leigh v Lancashire County Council — 2022
- Case reference
- 2405355/2022
- Decision date
- 28 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Slater
- Venue
- Manchester
- Panel members
- Mr D Wilson, Mr M Stemp
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms D Leigh
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, a Residential Child Care Worker and Assistant Manager, was disabled by reason of arthritis. The tribunal found that some disability-related complaints were well founded, including harassment related to disability in respect of the claimant's suspension on medical grounds on 14 April 2021.
The tribunal also found that the respondent failed to make reasonable adjustments in relation to requirements concerning restraints and sleep-ins, and that initiating the attendance capability policy on 16 or 17 December 2021 was discrimination arising from disability. Other complaints of harassment related to disability were not well founded.
The claimant withdrew the complaints of age discrimination, victimisation and direct disability discrimination, and those complaints were dismissed on withdrawal. The judgment listed a separate remedy hearing for 2 February 2024 and did not state any award figures in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | The complaint of harassment related to disability concerning the suspension on medical grounds on 14 April 2021 was well founded. Other harassment complaints related to disability were not well founded. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments in relation to the PCPs of requiring restraints and sleep-ins was well founded. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The complaint of discrimination arising from disability in relation to initiating the respondent's attendance capability policy on 16 or 17 December 2021 was well founded. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Age discrimination | The complaint of age discrimination was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Age | — |
| Victimisation | The complaint of victimisation was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The complaint of direct disability discrimination was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. |
Legal tests applied
4 references- s.6 Equality Act 2010
- s.15 Equality Act 2010
- s.20/21 Equality Act 2010
- s.26 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.