Case 2405501/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Fletcher v Bury Council — 2022
- Case reference
- 2405501/2022
- Decision date
- 16 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Porter Representation
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Fletcher
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 13 December 2022, Employment Judge Porter sitting at Manchester found that Mr J Fletcher was unfairly dismissed by Bury Council. The respondent was not in attendance and no Response had been received. The written record states that the tribunal gave reasons orally at the hearing, but those reasons are not set out in the extracted text.
The tribunal ordered compensation of £1,913.47, comprising a basic award of £1,288.47 and a compensatory award of £625.00. It also recorded that the recoupment regulations did not apply. The separate interest notice records the relevant decision day as 16 December 2022 and the stipulated rate as 8% per annum, but no interest sum was awarded in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was unfairly dismissed and awarded £1,913.47, made up of a £1,288.47 basic award and a £625.00 compensatory award. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and does not set out detailed written reasons. | Upheld | — | £1,913 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,913
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,288
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £625
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.