Case 2405528/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Styles & Wood Ltd (In Administration) — 2023
- Case reference
- 2405528/2020
- Decision date
- 31 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McDonald
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not contest the claims. Employment Judge McDonald decided the matter alone under Rule 21. The tribunal found that the respondent had no recognised trade union for collective bargaining or consultation, and no elected representatives were in place. The claimant was told the respondent was to be, or had been, placed into administration on 26, 27 or 28 February 2020, and the first redundancies took effect on 28 February 2020.
The tribunal found that the respondent employed over 200 employees at the establishment and that they were dismissed on, or around, the same date. There was no proper warning or notice to the workforce, no employee representatives had been elected or appointed under section 188A, and the dismissals were implemented without consultation or written information in advance. On that basis, the tribunal held that the respondent was in breach of section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992.
Under section 189 of the same Act, the tribunal made a protective award in favour of the claimant for the maximum protected period of 90 days beginning on 28 February 2020. The judgment states that this was a protective-award decision only and that no financial award was made at this stage; the claimant would need to quantify any individual payment later. The judgment also records the recoupment provisions under the Employment Protection (Recoupment of Jobseeker’s Allowance and Income Support) Regulations 1996.
The claimant’s claims for notice pay, unpaid holiday and unpaid pension were withdrawn by email dated 15 January 2023. Those claims were dismissed on withdrawal. The judgment therefore resolves the collective consultation claim only, with the remaining monetary claims not determined on their merits.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award under ss.188 and 189 TULRCA 1992 for failure to consult before dismissal of 20 or more employees; tribunal ordered a protected period of 90 days beginning on 28 February 2020. No financial award was quantified in this judgment because the protective award was dealt with as a two-stage process. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Claim for notice pay withdrawn by email dated 15 January 2023 and dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Claim for unpaid holiday withdrawn by email dated 15 January 2023 and dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | Claim for unpaid pension withdrawn by email dated 15 January 2023 and dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- Rule 21
- s.188 TULRCA 1992
- s.188A TULRCA 1992
- s.189 TULRCA 1992
- Employment Protection (Recoupment of Jobseeker's Allowance and Income Support) Regulations 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.