Case 2405785/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Hamdani v Simpson Millar LLP — 2020
- Case reference
- 2405785/2019
- Decision date
- 21 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hoey Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Hamdani
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment, dated 14 January 2020, states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant, Miss S Hamdani. No substantive findings on liability are recorded in the extracted text, and no remedy was awarded.
The case listing context identifies the claims as unfair dismissal and religion or belief discrimination against Simpson Millar LLP, but the one-line judgment itself does not set out any factual findings, legal analysis, or split of claims. The outcome recorded in the judgment is that the proceedings were dismissed because the claimant withdrew the claim.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Religion or belief discrimination | The extracted judgment text records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant. The specific claim type is taken from the case listing context rather than the one-line judgment text. | Withdrawn | Religion or belief | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The extracted judgment text records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant. The specific claim type is taken from the case listing context rather than the one-line judgment text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.