Case 2405820/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Darley v Cumbria County Council — 2019
- Case reference
- 2405820/2019
- Decision date
- 14 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Slater Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Darley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThese proceedings, in case nos. 2405820/2019 and 2410656/2019, were dismissed by Employment Judge Slater on 14 November 2019 after the claimant withdrew the claims. The judgment does not set out findings on the underlying allegations and does not record any substantive liability decision.
No remedy was awarded or discussed in the judgment. The order is a short disposal judgment only, recording the dismissal of the proceedings following withdrawal.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment records dismissal of the proceedings following withdrawal of the claims by the claimant; no merits finding or separate remedy is recorded. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment records dismissal of the proceedings following withdrawal of the claims by the claimant; no merits finding or separate remedy is recorded. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Sexual orientation discrimination | The judgment records dismissal of the proceedings following withdrawal of the claims by the claimant; no merits finding or separate remedy is recorded. | Withdrawn | Sexual orientation | — |
| Victimisation | The judgment records dismissal of the proceedings following withdrawal of the claims by the claimant; no merits finding or separate remedy is recorded. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment records dismissal of the proceedings following withdrawal of the claims by the claimant; no merits finding or separate remedy is recorded. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.