Case 2405855/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Jade McGranaghan-Stead v Hometrust Care Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2405855/2019
- Decision date
- 23 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hoey Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Jade McGranaghan-Stead
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Miss Jade McGranaghan-Stead brought proceedings against Hometrust Care Limited and that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. No findings on liability, remedy, or compensation are recorded in the extracted text.
The decision is a short disposal judgment dated 15 August 2019 and sent to the parties on 23 August 2019. It is signed by Employment Judge Hoey. No lay members or legal tests are identified in the judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states only that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The claim type is taken from the case listing context because the judgment text does not set out further particulars. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment states only that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The claim type is taken from the case listing context because the judgment text does not set out further particulars. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.