Case 2406057/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Nicathasaigh/Casey v Change Grow Live — 2021
- Case reference
- 2406057/2020
- Decision date
- 6 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge B Hodgson
- Panel members
- Mr A Price, Mr P Dobson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Nicathasaigh/Casey
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss A Nicathasaigh/Casey brought claims against Change Grow Live. The tribunal, sitting at Manchester by CVP before Employment Judge B Hodgson with Mr A Price and Mr P Dobson, gave a unanimous judgment after the hearing on 28 and 29 April 2021.
The judgment records that the claims of direct race discrimination and harassment were not upheld and were dismissed. The written judgment does not set out factual findings, legal reasoning, or any separate analysis of the harassment allegation.
No remedy was awarded or addressed in the judgment. The note states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within the stated time limit.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment records that the claim of direct race discrimination was not upheld and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Harassment | The judgment records that the harassment claim was not upheld and was dismissed. It does not give written reasons or a separate remedy finding. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.