Case 2406246/2019 · Employment Tribunal
in person v Sol Attendance Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2406246/2019
- Decision date
- 16 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Warren Signed
Parties
2 namedClaimant
in person
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal amended the respondent's name to Halton Windows Systems Limited and gave leave for the claimant to include a claim for a redundancy payment. The respondent did not attend and Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules 2013 applied.
The Tribunal found that the respondent had failed to provide itemised payslips explaining deductions from wages and awarded £780 for unnotified deductions over the last 13 weeks before the claim was presented. It also found that the claimant was dismissed without notice in breach of contract and awarded 7 weeks' net pay of £2,380.
The Tribunal found that two weeks of wages had been unlawfully deducted and awarded £680 net. It found that the claimant was dismissed for redundancy after 7 complete years' service and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £2,800, producing a total award of £6,640.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records a failure to provide itemised payslips explaining deductions from wages and awards £780 as the sum of unnotified deductions over the last 13 weeks before presentation of the claim. | Upheld | — | £780 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states the claimant was dismissed without notice in breach of contract and was entitled to 7 weeks' net pay. | Upheld | — | £2,380 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states the respondent unlawfully deducted two weeks of wages. | Upheld | — | £680 |
| Redundancy | The judgment states the claimant was dismissed for redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment. The judgment paragraph gives 14 August 2019 as the dismissal date, while the schedule gives 15 August 2019. | Upheld | — | £2,800 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,640
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.