Case 2406251/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms H Nunn & others (see attached schedule) v Elior UK plc & others (see attached schedule) — 2024
- Case reference
- 2406251/2023
- Decision date
- 23 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Butler JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms H Nunn & others (see attached schedule)
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 10 April 2024, the Tribunal gave the claimants an opportunity to make written representations, or to request a hearing, explaining why the claims should not be struck out because they had not been actively pursued. The claimants did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
Employment Judge M Butler therefore struck out the claims. The judgment records no substantive findings on the merits of the underlying claims and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part-time worker regulations | The judgment reasons do not specify the substantive claim type; this category is inferred from the tribunal listing categories for the case. The claims were struck out because they were not actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment reasons do not specify the substantive claim type; this category is inferred from the tribunal listing categories for the case. The claims were struck out because they were not actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.