Case 2406523/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Alker v Sovini Property Services — 2019
- Case reference
- 2406523/2019
- Decision date
- 16 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Parkin
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Alker
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a judgment dated 12 December 2019, Regional Employment Judge Parkin struck out the claim under rule 37. The Tribunal recorded that, by letter dated 23 November 2019, the claimant had been given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because he had not complied with the Tribunal's directions dated 7 November 2019 and the claim had not been actively pursued.
The Tribunal found that the claimant did not make representations in writing, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The claim was therefore struck out. The hearing listed for 6 to 8 January 2020 did not go ahead.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Struck out under rule 37 because the claimant did not comply with the Tribunal's directions dated 7 November 2019 and the claim had not been actively pursued; after the letter dated 23 November 2019, the claimant did not make sufficient written representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.