Mr H Rathod v Asda Stores Limited — 2023

Case reference: 2406529/2022
Decision date: 14 April 2023
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Holmes Date

Indexed: 19 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr H Rathod

Respondent

Asda Stores Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The Tribunal struck out the claim. It had written to the claimant on 30 March 2023 giving an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 13 February 2023 and because the claim had not been actively pursued.

The claimant failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing. The hearing listed for 6, 7 and 8 August 2024 was therefore cancelled.

Claims and outcomes

3 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Age discrimination	The judgment strikes out the claim as a whole; it does not separately discuss this head of claim. Classification follows the gov.uk listing category.	Struck out	Age	—
Unfair dismissal	The judgment strikes out the claim as a whole; it does not separately discuss this head of claim. Classification follows the gov.uk listing category.	Struck out	—	—
Unlawful deduction from wages	The judgment strikes out the claim as a whole; it does not separately discuss this head of claim. Classification follows the gov.uk listing category.	Struck out	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.