Case 2406616/2023 · Employment Tribunal

Ms G Asamoah v Cheshire & Wirral Partnership NHS Foundation Trust and 1 other — 2024

Case reference: 2406616/2023
Decision date: 5 April 2024
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Benson REPRESENTATION
Venue: Liverpool

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

3 named

Claimant

Ms G Asamoah

Respondents

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

Employment Judge Benson heard the case at Liverpool by video on 26 and 27 March 2024. The written record identifies claims of disability discrimination and race discrimination by Ms G Asamoah against Cheshire & Wirral Partnership NHS Foundation Trust and Derek Jones.

The tribunal held that all claims against both respondents had not been presented within the applicable time limit. It also found that it was not just and equitable to extend the time limit.

Accordingly, the claims against both respondents were dismissed. The record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Disability discrimination	Dismissed because the claim was not presented within the applicable time limit and it was not just and equitable to extend time; the judgment states this applied to claims against both respondents.	Dismissed	Disability	—
Race discrimination	Dismissed because the claim was not presented within the applicable time limit and it was not just and equitable to extend time; the judgment states this applied to claims against both respondents.	Dismissed	Race	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.