Case 2406785/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Walker v Marks and Spencer plc — 2024
- Case reference
- 2406785/2022
- Decision date
- 10 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ainscough
- Panel members
- Mrs A Ashworth, Mr S Carter
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Walker
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal dismissed the claimant's claims of direct race discrimination, indirect race discrimination, and harassment related to race. The written judgment records that each of those claims was unsuccessful.
The Tribunal also dismissed the claimant's claims for unlawful deduction from wages and holiday pay on termination of employment. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and the written record does not set out further findings or legal reasoning.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Direct race discrimination was unsuccessful and dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Race discrimination | Indirect race discrimination was unsuccessful and dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Harassment | Harassment related to race was unsuccessful and dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim for unlawful deduction from wages was unsuccessful and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The claim for holiday pay on termination of employment was unsuccessful and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.