Mr K Hulme Second Claimant: Ms H Hulme Third Claimant : Mr B Ward First v Back2Work Group Employment Service Limited Second Respondent: Revamp Technologies (UK) Limited Third Respondent: Adstrad Employment Services Limited — 2021

At the Manchester CVP hearing on 19 November 2021 before Employment Judge Mark Butler, the first claimant's claim against Back2Work Group Employment Service Limited and the second claimant's claim against Revamp Technologies (UK) Limited were each dismissed on withdrawal. The judgment did not identify the underlying causes of action for those withdrawn claims in the operative paragraphs.

The first claimant succeeded against Revamp Technologies (UK) Limited in claims for unpaid wages and unpaid holiday pay. The tribunal calculated unpaid wages at 24 days x 8 hours x £9.25, producing £1,776, and unpaid holiday pay at 7 days x 8 hours x £9.25, producing £518. The total ordered was £2,294 gross, with the respondent directed to account to the claimant and HMRC for tax and national insurance.

The second claimant succeeded against Back2Work Group Employment Service Limited in claims for unpaid wages and unpaid holiday pay. The tribunal calculated unpaid wages at 24 days x 7.08 hours x £9.75, producing £1,656.72, and unpaid holiday pay at 16 x 7.08 hours x £9.75, producing £1,104.48. The total ordered was £2,716.20 gross, again subject to tax and national insurance.

For the third claimant, the judgment records that the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed on withdrawal. It also states that Back2Work Group Employment Service Limited was the correct employer, that the claim should be amended to substitute it for Adstrad Employment Services Limited, and that service on the substituted respondent should take place before any determination, with Rule 21 mentioned if no response was received.