Case 2407695/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Coe v Amey plc — 2021
- Case reference
- 2407695/2021
- Decision date
- 23 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Slater Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Coe
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment addressed the claimant's complaint of unfair dismissal against Amey LTD. The tribunal recorded that section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires a claimant to have not less than two years' service in order to make an unfair dismissal complaint.
The tribunal found that the claimant had been employed by the respondent for less than two years and was therefore not entitled to bring the unfair dismissal complaint. It also recorded that the claimant had failed to give an acceptable reason, despite being given the opportunity, why the complaint should not be struck out.
Accordingly, the complaint of unfair dismissal was struck out. The judgment stated that the claimant's other complaints were not affected by this judgment. No remedy was awarded or assessed in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The unfair dismissal complaint was struck out under section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 because the claimant had less than two years' service and did not give an acceptable reason why it should not be struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.