Case 2408114/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Chadwick v Lidl Great Britain Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2408114/2020
- Decision date
- 7 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Peck
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Chadwick
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought claims of unfair dismissal and unauthorised deduction from wages against Lidl (Great Britain) Ltd. The hearing was held at Manchester by Cloud Video Platform before Employment Judge Peck sitting alone.
The tribunal recorded that the unfair dismissal claim failed and was dismissed. It also recorded that the unauthorised deduction from wages claim failed and was dismissed.
The written judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would only be provided if requested. No remedy was awarded in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the claim of unfair dismissal failed and was dismissed. Reasons were given orally and no written reasons are included in the supplied text. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment describes this as an unauthorised deduction from wages claim and records that it failed and was dismissed. Reasons were given orally and no written reasons are included in the supplied text. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.