Case 2408393/2021 · Employment Tribunal
S Martin and N Lowe v RKZ Hotel and Pub Company Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2408393/2021
- Decision date
- 17 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
S Martin and N Lowe
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment by Employment Judge Batten dated 10 January 2022 and sent to the parties on 17 January 2022. The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimants’ wages and had failed to pay their holiday entitlement.
For the wages claim, the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £423.46 to each claimant. For the holiday entitlement claim, it ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £317.60 to each claimant. The aggregate monetary liability on those two claims was £1,482.12 across both claimants.
The judgment did not determine the claimants’ remaining claims. It recorded that the sex discrimination claim and the whistleblowing detriment/unfair dismissal claims would proceed to a hearing listed for 15, 16 and 17 August 2022.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment found unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £423.46 to each claimant. | Upheld | — | £847 |
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 judgment found failure to pay holiday entitlement and ordered payment of the gross sum of £317.60 to each claimant. | Upheld | — | £635 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,482
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.