Mrs R Burrell & Others Ms Cooke & Others Miss E Bamber & Others Mrs Goldfinch & Others Mrs Broome & Others v P & A Food Management Services Limited (in Administration) and 3 others — 2021

The claimants were employed in catering roles in Lancashire schools. Their employment was affected by changes in contractors following the first respondent's insolvency, and those changes may have amounted to relevant transfers under TUPE. The second respondent denied that there was a relevant transfer to it and said that catering services were provided by Dolce Limited rather than Dolce UK Limited.

The preliminary issue was whether the claims against the second respondent should be rejected because the early conciliation certificates named Dolce Limited, while the claim forms named Dolce UK Limited. The Tribunal considered rule 12 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 and the authorities cited by the parties.

The Tribunal found that the names Dolce Limited and Dolce UK Limited had been used interchangeably and ambiguously in the employment documents. It held that the difference in the names was a minor error in the circumstances and that it would not be in the interests of justice to reject the claims. The second respondent's application was refused; no substantive TUPE findings were made.