Case 2408652/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs V Jones v MAN Energy Solutions UK Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2408652/2022
- Decision date
- 3 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Barker Representatives
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs V Jones
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing in Manchester by CVP on 29 August 2024, Employment Judge Barker struck out the claimant's protected disclosure detriment claims under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013. The tribunal held that those claims had no reasonable prospect of success at a final hearing because the claimant could not establish either that the detriment claims were brought within the primary time limit or that it was not reasonably practicable for her to have presented them in time.
The judgment records only that ruling on the protected disclosure detriment claims. It states that the claimant's remaining claims are unaffected by the decision, so no further substantive findings or remedy were made in this judgment. The written record was sent to the parties on 3 September 2024.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The claimant's claims of protected disclosure detriment were struck out under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 because the tribunal found no reasonable prospect of establishing that they were within the primary time limit or that it was not reasonably practicable to present them in time. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- rule 37 Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
- primary time limit
- not reasonably practicable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.