Case 2408779/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Collinge v Salford Primary Care Together CIC — 2024
- Case reference
- 2408779/2022
- Decision date
- 1 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Childe REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Collinge
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing in public before Employment Judge Childe on 1 March 2024. The respondent, Salford Primary Care Together CIC, applied to strike out the claimant's detriment claim under section 48 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 under Employment Tribunal Rule 37(1)(a), contending that it had no reasonable prospect of success.
The tribunal dismissed the respondent's strike-out application. The judgment does not give reasons beyond the order itself, and it does not determine the merits of the underlying detriment claim. The practical effect of the ruling is that the claim was allowed to proceed beyond the preliminary hearing stage.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | Preliminary hearing only. The respondent's application to strike out the claim of detriment under Employment Rights Act 1996 section 48, on the basis that it had no reasonable prospect of success, was dismissed. The judgment does not decide the merits of the underlying claim. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Employment Tribunal Rule 37(1)(a)
- no reasonable prospect of success
- Employment Rights Act 1996 section 48
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.