Case 2408799/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Z Malik v Pure (CGV) Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2408799/2021
- Decision date
- 22 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dunlop
- Venue
- Manchester
- Panel members
- Mr M Stemp, Ms M Dowling
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Z Malik
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal at Manchester, sitting on 18 September 2023 before Employment Judge Dunlop with lay members Mr M Stemp and Ms M Dowling, considered Mrs Z Malik’s complaint of harassment on the grounds of religion or belief against Pure (CGV) Ltd. The judgment records that the complaint was not well-founded and that the claim was dismissed.
The written record states that reasons for the decision were given orally at the hearing. It also records that written reasons would not be provided unless a request was made within 14 days of the sending of the written record, so the public judgment contains the outcome but not the tribunal’s detailed reasoning.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | The judgment states that the claimant’s complaint of harassment on the grounds of religion or belief was not well-founded. Written reasons were not provided because reasons were given orally at the hearing. | Dismissed | Religion or belief | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.