Case 2408814/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Saternus v Sooty’s and Sweep’s Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2408814/2021
- Decision date
- 21 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Franey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Saternus
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Regional Employment Judge Franey determined the claim on the papers. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,632.50.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £819.92. The judgment does not break either sum down into separate heads of loss beyond those two awards.
The judgment records that the hearing listed for 21 October 2021 was cancelled. A separate notice explains the tribunal interest regime and records the relevant decision day as 21 September 2021, but no interest amount is specified in the judgment itself. The total monetary award on the face of the decision is £2,452.42.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £1,632.50. | Upheld | — | £1,633 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £819.92. | Upheld | — | £820 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,452
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.