Case 2408814/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms D Tench v Readdle Labs Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2408814/2022
- Decision date
- 22 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms D Tench
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting under Rule 21, found that the respondent unlawfully harassed the claimant related to race contrary to section 26 of the Equality Act 2010. It also found that the respondent treated the claimant less favourably because of race contrary to section 13 of the Equality Act 2010.
Both claims succeeded. The judgment records that the remedy to which the claimant is entitled will be determined at a separate Remedy Hearing, so no financial award is set out in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | Liability found under section 26 Equality Act 2010; remedy to be determined at a Remedy Hearing. | Upheld | Race | — |
| Race discrimination | Liability found under section 13 Equality Act 2010; remedy to be determined at a Remedy Hearing. | Upheld | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 26 Equality Act 2010
- section 13 Equality Act 2010
- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.