Case 2409153/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Pidgeon v Tech Mahindra Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2409153/2023
- Decision date
- 9 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Slater Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Pidgeon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 16 January 2024, the Tribunal gave Mr J Pidgeon an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out. The stated reasons were that he had not complied with the Tribunal’s order dated 21 September 2023 and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
Mr Pidgeon did not make written representations and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Slater held that the claim should be struck out. The judgment records no substantive determination of liability and no remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Claim type inferred from the case listing; the judgment itself states only that 'the claim' was struck out after non-compliance with a Tribunal order and because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Claim type inferred from the case listing; the judgment itself states only that 'the claim' was struck out after non-compliance with a Tribunal order and because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.