Case 2409369/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Alker v Sovini Property Services — 2023
- Case reference
- 2409369/2022
- Decision date
- 27 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McDonald
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Alker
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out Mr A Alker's claim against Sovini Property Services. Employment Judge McDonald had directed the claimant, by letter dated 31 January 2023, to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out because it appeared to have no reasonable prospect of success. The reason given was that the claim related to a dismissal in 2019 which had already been the subject of a previous Tribunal claim.
The claimant did not reply to that correspondence. In consequence, the Tribunal concluded that the claim should be struck out and the hearing fixed for 14 March 2023 would not take place. The judgment records no award of compensation or other remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out on the basis that the claim appeared to have no reasonable prospect of success because it related to a dismissal in 2019 which had already been the subject of a previous tribunal claim. The claimant did not reply to the Tribunal's letter dated 31 January 2023 inviting representations or a request for a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- no reasonable prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.