Case 2409519/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Carroll v Royal Mail Group Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2409519/2022
- Decision date
- 22 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dunlop Representation
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Carroll
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the claim of Mr A Carroll against Royal Mail Group Ltd over three days in April 2025 at Manchester Employment Tribunal, before Employment Judge Dunlop sitting alone. The claimant's complaint of harassment related to disability was found to be well-founded.
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant compensation consisting solely of an award for injury to feelings in the sum of £5,000.00, together with agreed interest of £974.60 calculated from 31 October 2022 at the statutory rate of 8%, giving a total award of £5,974.60.
Reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing. Written reasons were not provided in this document, so the tribunal's detailed analysis and any legal tests applied are not available from the text reviewed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | Tribunal found the complaint of harassment related to disability well-founded. Award consists solely of injury to feelings. | Upheld | Disability | £5,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,975
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.